2008-04-16
| 11:04 | drewr | Does anyone else think WITH-META is misnamed? |
| 11:04 | drewr | Seems like SET-META or ASSOCM or something else would be more appropriate. |
| 11:05 | drewr | The WITH-* nomenclature has the connotation of a macro that evaluates a form with certain context. |
| 11:40 | Chouser | oh I hadn't thought of that, but now that you mention it, I think I agree. |
| 11:40 | Chouser | assoc-meta |
| 11:40 | Chouser | except that since metas are often a map that might be misconstrued. |
| 23:22 | drewr | Is the @ significant in @traced? |
| 23:29 | drewr | Ah-ha, yes it is. It's a reader macro for DEREF. |
| 23:42 | Chouser | right on! |
| 23:43 | Chouser | sorry. it's late. I shouldn't be speaking. |
| 23:47 | Chouser | in fact, I'm off to bed. g'night |
| 23:47 | drewr | Night :-) |